reprehensible acts, many years after the deceased’s death—acts which, had they committed them immediately after his death, would have ranked among the gravest evils forbidden by Allah and His Messenger. How much worse, then, after such a long time!
It is well known that among the prophets and others (1), some who were superior to al-Husayn were wrongfully and unjustly killed. His father was killed unjustly, and he was superior to him. Uthmān ibn Affān was also killed. His killing was the first of the great tribulations that occurred after the death of the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and it led to many times more evil and corruption than did the killing of al-Husayn. Others besides these were killed or died, yet no one—Muslim or otherwise—ever held a mourning assembly or engaged in wailing for someone dead or slain long after his death or killing, except these fools. Had they been birds, they would have been vultures; and had they been beasts, they would have been asses.
Another example is that some of them refuse to burn tamarisk wood (2), because they heard that al-Husayn’s blood fell upon a tamarisk tree. It is well known that there would be nothing objectionable about burning that very tree, even if it bore (3) blood of any kind—so what of all the other trees untouched by the blood?!
Their follies would take too long to describe and need not be related (4) through a chain of transmission. [However, one should