and both were merely concocted by liars, as will be explained later, Allah Most High willing. This is why the religiously upright descendants of al-Abbās and Alī advocated neither claim. The designation of Abū Bakr is different, for it is upheld by a group of scholars. Allah Most High willing, we shall state the decisive conclusion on this matter.
The point, however, is that they possess evidence and arguments of the same kind as those adduced by disputants in contested matters. It is enough for you to note that the weakest evidence they cited was the fact that he was called “the Caliph of the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace.” It has already been stated that, among those who held that Abū Bakr had been designated, some maintained that the designation was implicit, while others maintained that it was explicit.
Furthermore, Ibn Batta (1) narrated through his chain of transmission: Abū al-Hasan ibn Aslam al-Kātib (2) narrated to us; al-Zafarānī (3) narrated to us; Yazīd ibn Hārūn (4) narrated to us; al-Mubārak ibn Fadāla (5) narrated to us that Umar ibn Abd al-Azīz sent Muhammad ibn al-Zubayr