say that Allah is the Creator of the servants’ acts, it followed that he had to maintain that the servants’ acts are an act of Allah Most High (1), since, in his view, His act is the very thing He brings about (2). Thus, he deemed the servants’ acts to be an act of Allah. According to the best-known report from him, he described them as the servants’ own acts only figuratively; rather, he said that they were their acquisition. He defined acquisition as that which occurs (3) in the locus of a created capacity in conjunction with that capacity. He was followed in this by [a group of jurists] (4) from among the followers of Mālik, al-Shāfiī, and Ahmad.
Most people criticized this doctrine, saying: “The three marvels of speculative theology are al-Nazzām’s leap, the states of Abū Hāshim, and al-Asharī’s acquisition.” The following lines were recited concerning this:
Among the things that are said, though no intelligible reality lies beneath them ... that comes within the grasp of minds,
Are acquisition according to al-Asharī, the state according to al-Bahshamī (5), and the leap of al-Nazzām (6).
The rest of Ahl al-Sunnah, however, say [that] (7) the servants’ acts are truly acts of their own. This is one of the two positions attributed to al-Asharī. The majority of them, who (8) distinguish between