which we shall mention, or is this exclusive to him? There are two views on this, both recognized within Ahmad’s school.
Ibn ‘Abbās confirmed what ‘Ā’ishah reported, although there was some tension between them arising from their respective relations with ‘Alī; this was why she did not name him. Ibn ‘Abbās was sympathetic to ‘Alī and could not be suspected of bias against him. Even so, he simply confirmed everything she said and identified the other man as ‘Alī. He neither accused her of lying nor found fault with anything she narrated.
The two Sahīh collections report that ‘Ā’ishah said:
“I repeatedly appealed to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, concerning this. What prompted my repeated appeals was nothing other than my conviction that, after him, the people would never love a man who took his place. I also believed that (1) whoever took his place would be regarded by the people as an ill omen. I therefore wanted this to persuade the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, to choose someone other than Abū Bakr.”
Al-Bukhārī said:
“Ibn ‘Umar, Abū Mūsā and Ibn ‘Abbās also narrated it from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace (2).”
The two Sahīh collections also report that she said:
“When the illness of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, became severe, Bilāl came to notify him that it was time for prayer. He said, ‘Tell Abū Bakr to lead the people in prayer.’ She said: I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, Abū Bakr is a tender-hearted man, and whenever he stands in your place, he does not