impossible (1). Rather, we know that the span from the Flood to that which has no end in the future is greater than the span from the Hijra to that which has no end in the future. Likewise, [the span from the Hijra back to that which has no beginning (2) in the past is greater than the span from the Flood back to that which has no beginning in the past, even though neither has a beginning (3). For] (4) that which has no end in either direction is not an actually existing, encompassed and delimited whole, such that it could be said: “They are alike (5) in magnitude, so how can one be greater than the other?” Rather, for it to be endless means that it continually produces one thing after another; it is not an assembled, encompassed whole.
The fact that both are endless does not entail equality in magnitude, unless everything described as endless had a determinate magnitude (6), which is false. That which is endless has neither a fixed limit nor a determinate magnitude. Rather, it is like a number subject to repeated multiplication: just as the fact that one, ten, one hundred, and one thousand can each be multiplied (7) without end does not entail that their respective magnitudes are equal, so too here.
Moreover, these two are finite at one end—the future end—and infinite at the other—the past.