How, then, could he testify on Abū Bakr’s behalf that Allah was with them both without knowing this? Speaking without knowledge is impermissible.
Moreover, Allah reported this statement of the Messenger with approval, not condemnation. It is therefore clear that his words:
“Indeed, Allah is with us.”
are a truthful declaration that Allah commanded and approved, not something (1) He condemned and censured.
Furthermore, it is well known that even the least intelligent person would recognize the character of someone accompanying him on a journey like this, when the leaders of the people among whom they live (2) are hostile to him and seek to kill him, while his allies there are unable to help him. How, then, could he choose as his companion one person who professes loyalty to him rather than anyone else, when that person has shown him his sorrow yet is inwardly his enemy? Meanwhile, the man he accompanies believes him to be his ally. Only the most foolish and ignorant of people would do this.
May Allah disgrace whoever attributes such ignorance and stupidity to His Messenger, who is the most perfect of all creation in intellect, knowledge, and experience.
I have indeed heard concerning the Mongol king Khudābandah (3), for whom this Rāfidī composed