are utterly ignorant and driven by caprice.
It should [also] (1) be known that not everything for which some people criticize them is false. Among their views are some on which Ahl al-Sunna have differed: some disagree with them, while others agree with them, and the correct position lies with those who agree with them. Nevertheless, there is no issue on which they alone hold a position and are correct.
Some people count among their innovations reciting the basmala aloud; refraining from wiping over leather socks, either altogether or when not traveling; making the qunūt supplication in the dawn prayer; the tamattu form of Hajj; denying that a divorce pronounced in an innovated manner takes effect (2); flattening graves; letting the hands hang at one’s sides during prayer; and similar issues over which the scholars of Ahl al-Sunna have differed. In such matters, the correct position may be the one that agrees with them (3), just as it may be the one that opposes them. The matter, however, is open to independent juristic reasoning and should not be condemned unless it becomes the hallmark of something impermissible, thereby serving as evidence of what must be condemned, even though the matter itself remains open to independent juristic reasoning. One example is placing a stripped palm stalk on a grave, for this has been reported from some of the Companions, as have other such practices.
Another example of their foolishness is that they designate several shrines for the Awaited One, at which they await him—such as the underground vaults (4), including the one at Samarra where they claim he disappeared (5), as well as other shrines—and they have