Therefore, if they testify that Abū Bakr has the greater right to leadership, they must be truthful in this testimony and know what they are testifying to. Likewise, if they testify that one person is obedient to Allah and another disobedient to Him, or that one has done something deserving reward and another something deserving punishment, their testimony must be accepted. For bearing witness over people includes testifying to their blameworthy and praiseworthy deeds. Testifying that one person is obedient and another disobedient entails testifying to their actions, the rulings governing those actions, and their qualities. This is the point we sought to establish.
In the two Sahīh collections, it is reported from ‘Umar concerning the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace:
“A funeral procession passed by him, and the people spoke well of the deceased. He said, ‘It is assured.’ Another funeral procession passed by him, and they spoke ill of the deceased. He said, ‘It is assured.’ He was asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what do you mean by saying, “It is assured”?’ He replied, ‘You spoke well of this deceased person, so I said that Paradise was assured for him. You spoke ill of the other deceased person, so I said that the Fire was assured for him. You are Allah’s witnesses on earth.’” (1)
Further evidence is provided by His words:
“And whoever opposes the Messenger after guidance has become clear to him and follows a path other than that of the believers, We will leave him to what he has turned to”—to the end of the verse. [Surah al-Nisā’: 115]
He threatens punishment for opposing the Messenger and following a path other than that of the believers. This implies that each is blameworthy, for opposing the Messenger alone is blameworthy by consensus. Thus, if the other were not