group. These men were, according to them, united in their allegiance to Ali and in agreement on that allegiance.
Thus, the reports of a small group whose members could collude in transmitting them (1) do not constitute mass transmission, since they could agree to lie. If the Rāfidah consider it possible for the vast majority of the Companions—despite their great numbers—to apostatize from Islam and conceal something that, under ordinary circumstances, could not be concealed by collusion, then they should all the more readily consider it possible for a few of them to lie deliberately (2).
They explicitly accuse the Companions of lying whenever they transmit something contrary to their own inclinations (3). How, then, can they believe them in a matter like this if those transmitting [it] (4) are themselves biased?
It is well known that Ali’s supporters are predisposed to support him. How, then, can they be believed when they transmit an explicit designation of him? Moreover, people of sound judgment and scholars versed in transmitted reports know that no Muslim sect is more prone to deliberate lying and denying the truth than the Shīʿah. Other groups are different: the Khawārij (5), although they have departed from religion, tell the truth and do not deliberately lie. Likewise, the Muʿtazilah regard truthfulness as a religious duty. As for the Shīʿah, lying has predominated among them ever since they first appeared.