and many (1) of the fish greeted him, but neither the jarrī nor the marmāhī fish (2) spoke. When asked about this, he replied, ‘Allah caused those fish He had purified to speak, and silenced those He had made impure and cast away.’” (3)
The response has several aspects:
First: [A demand] should be made by asking (4): Where is the chain of transmission for this account that (5) establishes its authenticity and reliability? Anyone can relate unsupported stories without a chain of transmission, but doing so proves nothing.
Second: The Prophet’s mule—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—was not in his possession.
Third: None of the authors of authoritative works transmitted this account. Had such a story been authentic, there would have been ample interest and incentive to transmit it. Yet the person relating it has provided no chain of transmission. How, then, can it be accepted merely on the strength of a story without any chain of transmission?
Fourth: All fish are lawful to eat, as authentically reported from the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—who said concerning the sea:
“Its water is purifying, and its dead creatures are lawful.” (6)