and the army grew with the arrival of Ja‘far and those who came with him from Abyssinia, such as Abū Mūsā al-Ash‘arī and his companions, and the Abyssinians who accompanied Ja‘far aboard the ship. Their numbers were further increased by the people of Khaybar who were with them. Yet none of these people narrated this report. This is grounds for concluding with certainty that it is a fabricated lie.
Criticism of Fudayl and those after him is contingent upon certainty that they (1) narrated it. Otherwise, its attribution to them is open to question, for the first narrator to transmit it from Fudayl is al-Husayn ibn al-Hasan al-Ashqar al-Kūfī (2). (* Al-Bukhārī said: “He transmits rejected reports.” Al-Nasā’ī and al-Dāraqutnī (3) said: “He is not strong.” Al-Azdī said: “Weak.” Al-Sa‘dī said: “Husayn al-Ashqar *) (4) is an extremist who reviles the best people.” Ibn ‘Adī said: “He narrated a rejected hadith, and in my judgment the fault lies with him. A number of weak narrators in Kūfa would ascribe to him the hadiths they transmitted from him (5).”
As for the third chain of transmission, it includes ‘Ammār ibn Matar, narrating from Fudayl ibn Marzūq. It was said by