Minhaj as-SunnahIbn Taimiya

—those who utter words of disbelief—following the procedure for calling an apostate to repentance if he openly professes such a belief; otherwise, his position falls within the doctrines of concealed unbelief and hypocrisy.

If it should be supposed that a person does not realize that such beliefs are contrary to Islam—either because he has only recently embraced Islam or because he was raised among ignorant people who hold similar beliefs—he is like someone who is unaware that prayer, or some part of it, is obligatory; or who believes that religious obligations apply to ordinary people but not to the elect, and that prohibitions such as fornication and wine are permissible for the elect but not for ordinary people.

Many who profess Shiism, as well as many who profess speculative theology, Sufism, or philosophy, have fallen into many of these views. They are false doctrines whose falsehood is well known to people of knowledge and faith and is evident to anyone who is among the people of Islam and knowledge.

[Section on the Rāfidī’s claim that Ali was the authority to whom the Companions turned in their difficult questions, and its refutation]

(Section)

The Rāfidī said (1):

“The Companions would turn (2) to him with their difficult questions, and Umar referred many cases to him, saying (3) concerning them: ‘Had it not been for Ali, Umar would have perished.’”

The response is as follows: The Companions did not refer exclusively to him, or exclusively to anyone else, concerning any matter of the religion, whether clear or difficult. Rather, whenever a new case arose,

(1) In (K), p. 180 (M). (2) K reads: “and it was to him—peace be upon him—that they turned.” (3) K reads: “and he said.”
مِمَّنْ يَتَكَلَّمُ بِالْكُفْرِ، كَاسْتِتَابَةِ الْمُرْتَدِّ إِنْ كَانَ مُظْهِرًا لِذَلِكَ، وَإِلَّا كَانَ دَاخِلًا فِي مَقَالَاتِ أَهْلِ الزَّنْدَقَةِ وَالنِّفَاقِ. وَإِنْ قُدِّرَ أَنَّ بَعْضَ النَّاسِ خَفِيَ عَلَيْهِ مُخَالَفَةُ ذَلِكَ لِدِينِ الْإِسْلَامِ: إِمَّا لِكَوْنِهِ حَدِيثَ عَهْدٍ بِالْإِسْلَامِ، أَوْ لِنَشْأَتِهِ بَيْنَ قَوْمٍ جُهَّالٍ يَعْتَقِدُونَ مِثْلَ ذَلِكَ - فَهَذَا بِمَنْزِلَةِ مَنْ يَجْهَلُ وُجُوبَ الصَّلَاةِ أَوْ بَعْضِهَا، أَوْ يَرَى الْوَاجِبَاتِ تَجِبُ عَلَى الْعَامَّةِ دُونَ الْخَاصَّةِ، وَأَنَّ الْمُحَرَّمَاتِ - كَالزِّنَا وَالْخَمْرِ - مُبَاحٌ لِلْخَاصَّةِ دُونَ الْعَامَّةِ. وَهَذِهِ الْأَقْوَالُ قَدْ وَقَعَ فِي كَثِيرٍ مِنْهَا كَثِيرٌ مِنَ الْمُنْتَسِبِينَ إِلَى التَّشَيُّعِ، وَالْمُنْتَسِبِينَ إِلَى كَلَامٍ أَوْ تَصَوُّفٍ أَوْ تَفَلْسُفٍ، وَهِيَ مَقَالَاتٌ بَاطِلَةٌ مَعْلُومَةُ الْبُطْلَانِ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ وَالْإِيمَانِ، لَا يَخْفَى بُطْلَانُهَا عَلَى مَنْ هُوَ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْإِسْلَامِ وَالْعِلْمِ. [فصل كلام الرافضي أن عليا كان مرجع الصحابة في مشكلاتهم والرد عليه] (فَصْلٌ) قَالَ الرَّافِضِيُّ (١) : " وَإِلَيْهِ يَرْجِعُ (٢) الصَّحَابَةُ فِي مُشْكِلَاتِهِمْ، وَرَدَّ عُمَرُ فِي قَضَايَا كَثِيرَةٍ، قَالَ (٣) فِيهَا: لَوْلَا عَلِيٌّ لَهَلَكَ عُمَرُ " . وَالْجَوَابُ: أَنْ يُقَالَ: مَا كَانَ الصَّحَابَةُ يَرْجِعُونَ إِلَيْهِ وَلَا إِلَى غَيْرِهِ وَحْدَهُ فِي شَيْءٍ مِنْ دِينِهِ لَا وَاضِحِهِ وَلَا مُشْكِلِهِ، بَلْ كَانَ إِذَا نَزَلَتِ النَّازِلَةُ
(١) فِي (ك) ص ١٨٠ (م) . (٢) ك: وَإِلَيْهِ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ رَجَعَ. (٣) ك: وَقَالَ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies