al-Muhabbar (1) and others like him. Hadith experts regard this as a fabricated report falsely attributed to the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—as stated by Abū Hātim ibn Hibbān al-Bustī, al-Dāraqutnī, Ibn al-Jawzī, and others (2). Yet (3), because it accorded with these people’s views, they cited it as evidence, as is their custom, even though the wording of the hadith contradicts their doctrine.
The wording uses awwala (“first”) in the accusative case. It has also been narrated as:
“When Allah created the Intellect.”
That is, He addressed it with these words at the very beginning of its creation. The intended meaning, therefore, is that He addressed it when He created it—not that it was the first of all created things. This is why the hadith says midway through:
“I have created no creature more honored in My sight than you.”
This indicates that He had created others before it, and it describes the Intellect as coming forward and turning back.
(1) S and B read: *ka-Dāwūd ibn al-Muhibb* (“like Dāwūd ibn al-Muhibb”), which is a textual corruption.
(2) After relating this hadith through its various chains of transmission, Ibn al-Jawzī stated in *al-Mawdū'āt* (*Fabricated Reports*), vol. 1, p. 174: “This hadith is not authentically established from the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace. Yahyā ibn Ma'īn said: ‘Al-Fadl is an evil man.’ Ibn Hibbān said: ‘Hafs ibn Umar narrates fabricated reports, so it is impermissible to cite him as evidence. As for Sayf, he is a liar by consensus.’” Ibn al-Jawzī then related the hadith through another route, vol. 1, p. 175, and declared it inauthentic. He subsequently related, vol. 1, p. 176, al-Dāraqutnī’s statement that *Kitāb al-'Aql* (*The Book of the Intellect*) was fabricated by four men: the first was Maysara ibn Abd Rabbih; Dāwūd ibn al-Muhabbar then stole it from him and furnished it with chains of transmission different from Maysara’s; Abd al-Azīz ibn Abī Rajā then stole it and furnished it with other chains; and Sulaymān ibn Īsā al-Sijzī subsequently stole it and supplied still other chains. Ibn al-Jawzī added, vol. 1, p. 177: “Many hadiths have been related concerning the intellect, but none of them is established as authentic.” See also: al-Suyūtī, *al-La'ālī al-Masnū'a* (*The Fashioned Pearls*), vol. 1, pp. 129–130; al-Sakhāwī, *al-Maqāsid al-Hasana* (*The Laudable Aims*), pp. 18[0–9], 134; Ibn Irāq al-Kinānī, *Tanzīh al-Sharī'a* (*Vindicating the Sacred Law*), vol. 1, p. 213; al-Shawkānī, *al-Fawā'id al-Majmū'a* (*The Collected Benefits*), p. 476; al-Fatanī, *Tadhkirat al-Mawdū'āt* (*A Reminder Concerning Fabricated Reports*), pp. 29–30; al-Ajlūnī, *Kashf al-Khafā* (*Removing Obscurity*), vol. 1, pp. 236–237, 263; Alī al-Qārī, *al-Mawdū'āt* (*Fabricated Reports*), pp. 27, 30; and al-Albānī, *Silsilat al-Ahādīth al-Da'īfa wa-l-Mawdū'a* (*Series of Weak and Fabricated Hadiths*), vol. 1, p. 11. See also al-Dhahabī’s remarks concerning Dāwūd ibn al-Muhabbar in *Mīzān al-I'tidāl* (*The Scale of Moderation*), vol. 2, p. 20, and *al-Safadiyya*, vol. 1, pp. 238–239.
(3) S and B read: *wa-lākin* (“but”).