and one body of legal opinions with another, (everyone) possessed of sense (1) will know as a matter of necessity that Umar possessed many times as much knowledge as Alī. We found Aisha’s corpus of hadiths with connected chains (2) to comprise 2,210 reports (3), and Abū Hurayra’s hadiths with connected chains to number 5,374. We found that Ibn Umar and Anas each had a corpus close in size to Aisha’s; that Jābir and Ibn Abbās each (4) had more (5) than 1,500; and that Ibn Masūd had a little over 800. Each of those we have named, with the exception of Abū Hurayra and Anas, had more legal opinions than Alī, or approximately as many (6). Thus, this ignorant man’s claim is invalid (7).”
He went on to say (8): “If they say: Did the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) appoint [Alī to oversee the one-fifth shares and adjudicate in Yemen? We reply: Yes; but Abū Bakr’s direct observation of the judicial rulings of the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace)] (9) was a stronger and more firmly established source of knowledge than what Alī possessed while in Yemen. The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) also appointed