anything; yet the Rāfidah are among the most ignorant of all people regarding both rational and transmitted evidence (1).”
[Fourth: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) appointed Alī as his deputy over Medina despite the short duration of his absence]
Section.
The Rāfidi said (2):
“Fourth: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) appointed him as his deputy over Medina despite the short duration of his absence (3). It therefore follows that (4) he must be his successor after (5) his death, and, by consensus, this can be none other than Alī. Moreover, since he (6) did not dismiss him from his position in Medina, he is therefore a successor (to him) (7) there after his death. If he was his successor there (8), then, by consensus, he was his successor elsewhere as well.”
The response is that this argument and others like it are invalid and as flimsy as the house (9) of a spider. It may be answered in several ways:
First: According to one of the two views, we say that the Prophet appointed Abū Bakr as his successor after his death, as explained above. If the Rāfidah say, “Rather, he appointed Alī as his successor,” they are told: “The Rāwandiyya, who are of your ilk, said that he appointed al-Abbās as his successor.” Everyone familiar with the authentically transmitted reports knows that the hadiths indicating that he appointed someone as his successor after his death point only