These hadiths and others like them are recorded in the Sahih collections. This being so, it is known that the mere bond of brotherhood does not entail (1) equality in every respect, nor does it entail complete affinity and resemblance in every respect, but only in some (2) respects.
Why, then, is it claimed that the Prophet’s bond of brotherhood with Alī, had it been authentically established, would have entailed the imamate and preeminence, when this bond of brotherhood was shared by others? It is established through multiple routes in the Sahih collections that the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—said:
“If I were to take anyone on earth as an intimate friend, I would take Abū Bakr as an intimate friend. But your Companion is Allah’s intimate friend. No small doorway into the mosque shall be left unsealed except Abū Bakr’s doorway. Of all people, Abū Bakr has conferred the greatest favor upon us through his companionship and resources.” (3).
This establishes special distinctions for Abū Bakr in which no one shares (4) with him [besides him] (5). It also states explicitly that, among all the people on earth, no one is dearer to him, holds a higher standing with him, occupies a loftier rank, or is more closely associated with him than Abū Bakr.
- As related in the two Sahih collections, he was asked: [“Which person is dearest to you?”
He replied, “Āisha.”
He was asked, “And among men?”
He replied, “Her father.” (6). It is also related in the two Sahih collections “on the authority of Umar