As for detailed belief in what [Muhammad] (1) was sent with, no such covenant was taken from them. How, then, could they have been bound by a covenant to show allegiance to one of the Companions rather than to any of the other believers?
Fourth: The wording of the verse is:
“And ask those of Our messengers whom We sent before you: Did We appoint any gods besides the Most Merciful to be worshipped?”
[Surah al-Zukhruf: 45]
They are not asked here, “What were you sent with?” (2).
Fifth: As for the statement, “They were sent with these three things,” if the speaker means that they were sent with nothing else, this is a lie against the messengers. If he means that these were the foundations of what they were sent with, this too is a lie. For the foundations of religion with which they were sent—including belief in Allah and the Last Day and the foundations (3) of the revealed laws—were [more important] (4) to them than mentioning belief in one of the Companions of another prophet, and indeed than affirming the prophethood of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace. They were required to acknowledge Muhammad’s prophethood only in general terms, just as we are required to acknowledge their prophethood in general terms. However, whoever among them lived to see him was required to believe in his revealed law in detail, just as we are. As for detailed belief in the revealed laws of the prophets, it is