Third:
Even supposing that this distinction belonged to him alone, it would not be one of the qualities exclusive to the imamate, nor would it entail that he was superior in every respect. When Khidr knew three matters that Moses did not know, this did not make him superior to Moses in every respect. Likewise, when the hoopoe said to Solomon:
“I have learned what you have not learned,”
[Sūrat al-Naml: 22]
this did not make it more knowledgeable than Solomon in every respect.
Fourth:
Alī knew this matter, but how can it be known that none of the other Companions knew it? The claim that he alone knew it is false; thus, the claim of exclusivity is invalid under either supposition. Indeed, it is established by mass transmission that Abū Bakr’s striving with his wealth was greater than Alī’s, for Abū Bakr was a man of means. The Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—said of him:
“No wealth has benefited me as much as Abū Bakr’s wealth.” (1)
Alī was poor, whereas Abū Bakr’s personal striving was also greater, as we shall mention—if Allah Most High wills (2).
[Section: The Eighteenth Proof—“O you who believe, when you consult the Messenger privately, give charity before your private consultation”—and the Response to It]
Section
The Rāfidi (3) said: “The eighteenth proof is the saying of Allah Most High:
‘O you who believe, when you consult the Messenger privately, give charity before your private consultation.’