Minhaj as-SunnahIbn Taimiya

And these men say the same (1) regarding the motion of the celestial sphere: it moves continually by its own will and power, without any cause necessitating its possession of will and power, although its will, power, and motions are temporally originated after not having existed (2), arising without anything that made it willing and moving. What is possible has thus come to be without the complete preponderating factor that necessitated its preponderance, and a temporal event has occurred without the complete cause that necessitated its occurrence.

Yet they denounce the Qadariyya for saying:

An agent possessed of power gives preponderance to one of two alternatives within his power without a preponderating factor, but rather through an act of will (* which [he himself] (3) originates, without anyone else producing that will in him. They say that he brought the will about without another act of will *) (4).

Regarding the motion of the celestial sphere, however, these men go even further than that, thereby contradicting their own sound principles. If they acknowledge that temporally originated acts of will and motions (5) arise only through a cause that necessitates their occurrence, and that (6), when the cause is complete, they must occur, whereas when it is deficient, their occurrence is impossible, they must know that what they have said concerning the eternity of the world and the cause of temporal events is false.

For in their view, there is no cause beyond the celestial sphere necessitating the occurrence of the conceptions and acts of will that arise within it, except something of the same kind as that possessed by a created being dependent upon the Necessary

(1) A reads: “And thus he says it”; B: “And thus he says.” (2) N alone reads: “temporally originated without not having existed,” which is a corruption. (3) “He himself” is an addition in A alone. (4) The text between the asterisks is omitted from B alone. (5) N alone reads: “the temporally originated will and motion.” (6) A and B read: “For indeed it,” which is an error.
وَهَذَا يَقُولُهُ (١) هَؤُلَاءِ فِي حَرَكَةِ الْفَلَكِ: إِنَّهُ يَتَحَرَّكُ دَائِمًا بِإِرَادَتِهِ وَقُدْرَتِهِ مِنْ غَيْرِ سَبَبٍ أَوْجَبَ كَوْنَهُ مُرِيدًا قَادِرًا، مَعَ أَنَّ إِرَادَتَهُ وَقُدْرَتَهُ وَحَرَكَاتِهِ حَادِثَةٌ بَعْدَ أَنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ (٢) حَادِثَةً مِنْ غَيْرِ شَيْءٍ جَعْلَهُ مُرِيدًا مُتَحَرِّكًا، فَقَدْ حَصَلَ الْمُمْكِنُ بِدُونِ الْمُرَجَّحِ التَّامِّ الَّذِي أَوْجَبَ رُجْحَانَهُ، وَحَصَلَ الْحَادِثُ بِدُونِ السَّبَبِ التَّامِّ الَّذِي أَوْجَبَ حُدُوثَهُ. ثُمَّ إِنَّهُمْ يُنْكِرُونَ عَلَى الْقَدَرِيَّةِ قَوْلَهُمْ: إِنَّ الْقَادِرَ يُرَجِّحُ أَحَدَ مَقْدُورَيْهِ بِلَا مُرَجِّحٍ بَلْ بِإِرَادَةٍ (* يُحْدِثُهَا [هُوَ] (٣) مِنْ غَيْرِ أَنْ يُحْدِثَ لَهُ غَيْرُهُ تِلْكَ الْإِرَادَةَ، وَيَقُولُونَ: إِنَّهُ أَوْجَبَ الْإِرَادَةَ بِلَا إِرَادَةٍ *) (٤) . وَهَؤُلَاءِ يَقُولُونَ مَا هُوَ أَبْلَغُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ فِي حَرَكَةِ الْفَلَكِ، وَهُوَ يُنَاقِضُ أُصُولَهُمُ الصَّحِيحَةَ، فَإِذَا كَانُوا يُسَلِّمُونَ أَنَّ الْإِرَادَاتِ الْحَادِثَةَ وَالْحَرَكَاتِ (٥) الْحَادِثَةَ لَا تَحْدُثُ إِلَّا بِسَبَبٍ يُوجِبُ حُدُوثَهَا، وَأَنَّهُ (٦) عِنْدَ كَمَالِ السَّبَبِ يَجِبُ حُدُوثُهَا، وَعِنْدَ نَقْصِهِ يُمْتَنَعُ حُدُوثُهَا، عَلِمُوا أَنَّ مَا قَالُوهُ فِي قِدَمِ الْعَالَمِ وَسَبَبِ الْحَوَادِثِ بَاطِلٌ. فَإِنَّهُ لَيْسَ فَوْقَ الْفَلَكِ عِنْدَهُمْ سَبَبٌ يُوجِبُ حُدُوثَ مَا يَحْدُثُ لَهُ مِنَ التَّصَوُّرَاتِ وَالْإِرَادَاتِ إِلَّا مِنْ جِنْسِ مَا لِلْمَخْلُوقِ الْفَقِيرِ إِلَى وَاجِبِ
(١) ا: وَهَكَذَا يَقُولُهُ؛ ب: وَهَكَذَا يَقُولُ. (٢) ن (فَقَطْ) : حَادِثَةٌ مِنْ غَيْرِ أَنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ، وَهُوَ تَحْرِيفٌ. (٣) هُوَ: زِيَادَةٌ فِي (ا) فَقَطْ. (٤) مَا بَيْنَ النَّجْمَتَيْنِ سَاقِطٌ مِنْ (ب) فَقَطْ. (٥) ن (فَقَطْ) : الْإِرَادَةُ الْحَادِثَةُ وَالْحَرَكَةُ. (٦) ا، ب: فَإِنَّهُ، وَهُوَ خَطَأٌ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies