his heart, and this world has been made dear to him (1)—a world he can attain only by depriving the people of truth of (2) their right?”
The response is as follows:
“As for his taking Ali [and Fātima] (3), al-Hasan, and al-Husayn with him for the mutual imprecation, this is established by an authentic hadith narrated by Muslim from Sa'd ibn Abī Waqqās. He said in a lengthy hadith (4): ‘When this verse was revealed—
“Say, ‘Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves.’” [Surah Āl Imrān: 61] (5)
—the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—summoned Ali, Fātima, al-Hasan, and al-Husayn and said, “O Allah, these are my family.”’ Yet this provides no proof of either the imamate or superiority.
As for his statement:
‘Allah designated him as the very self of the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace. Actual identity is impossible, so what remains is equality with him (6). The Messenger possesses universal authority, and the same applies to one equal to him’ (7).
We reply:
We do not grant that equality is the only remaining possibility, for there is no evidence of that. Rather, construing it in this way is impossible, because no one is equal to the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—neither Ali (8) nor anyone else.