Then, if Allah had decreed that one of them should live longer than the other, it would be as He had decreed. If He had decreed the longer life for one of them and wanted them either to agree upon which of them should receive it or for one to give the other preference in it, with both of them content with that, there would be no objection. But if they were both averse to it, how could it befit Allah’s wisdom and mercy to set them against one another and sow enmity between them? Were that true—exalted is Allah above such a thing! Furthermore, even if this supposed decree had occurred, though it is false, why would it have been delayed from the time Allah created them, before Adam, until the time of the Hijra? It could only have occurred immediately after their creation.
Fifth:
The Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—did not take Ali, or anyone else, as a brother. Rather, everything narrated to that effect is false. The hadith concerning brotherhood narrated in this regard—despite its weakness and invalidity—only places his taking Ali as his brother in Medina. This is how al-Tirmidhī narrated it (1). As for his taking Ali as his brother in Mecca, that is false on either assumption. It is also established, by the consensus of the scholars of transmitted reports, that there was no offering of oneself as a ransom and no preferring another’s life over one’s own.
Sixth:
That Gabriel and Michael should descend to protect one human being from