Ninth:
It may be said: Grant that this indicates that, in this respect, they are superior to those who do not possess this quality. But why do you claim that this quality is exclusive to Ali? Rather, everyone (1) whom neither trade nor sale distracts from the remembrance of Allah, the establishment of prayer, and the giving of zakāt, and who fears the Day of Resurrection, possesses this quality. Why, then, do you claim (2) that no one other than Ali possesses it? The wording of the verse indicates that they are men, not a single man. This proves that the quality is not exclusive to Ali; rather, he and others share it. It therefore does not follow that he is superior to those who share it with him.
Tenth:
Even if it were conceded that Ali surpassed others in this quality, why do you claim that this would necessarily confer the imamate upon him? Even if one concedes that the less excellent may not be given precedence over the more excellent, this applies only to (3) the aggregate of qualities relevant to the imamate. Otherwise, not everyone who excels in one virtuous quality thereby deserves to be the imam.
Were this reasoning valid, it could be said: Among the Companions were those who killed more disbelievers than Ali did; those who spent more of their wealth than Ali did; and those who prayed and fasted more than Ali did. (4) Among them were those who suffered more harm for the sake of Allah than Ali did; those who were older than Ali (5); and those who possessed knowledge that Ali did not possess. In sum, no single prophet (6) can possess everything that every other prophet (7) possesses in every respect, nor can any one Companion possess everything that every single one