to demonstrate this author’s fabrication or the extent (1) of his ignorance, for he said:
“* They unanimously agreed that it was revealed concerning Ali.”
If only I knew: who among the scholars—those knowledgeable about consensus in matters such as these—transmitted this consensus? * (2) For a claim of consensus in such a matter is accepted only from those versed in transmitted reports and in the points of consensus and disagreement found within them.
If a theologian, commentator, historian, or the like were to make a bare claim that something had been transmitted, without an established chain of transmission, his claim would not be relied upon. How, then, when he claims a consensus?!
The third response is as follows: These commentators from whose books he quoted (3)—as well as those more knowledgeable than they—have transmitted reports that contradict this alleged consensus. Al-Thalabī [did transmit] in his commentary (4) that Ibn Abbās said, “It was revealed concerning Abū Bakr.”
He also transmitted from Abd al-Malik, who said:
“I asked Abū Jafar, and he replied, ‘They are the believers.’
“I said, ‘Some people say that it refers to Ali.’
“He replied, ‘Ali is one of those who believe.’”
The same was reported from al-Dahhāk.
Ibn Abī Hātim narrated in his commentary from his father, who said:
“Abū Sālih, the scribe of al-Layth, related to us: Muāwiyah [ibn Sālih] (5) related to us: Ali ibn Abī Talhah related to us, from Ibn Abbās, concerning this verse, that he said:
“‘Everyone who believes (6) has thereby taken Allah, His Messenger, and those who believe as allies.’”
He said:
“Abū Saīd al-Ashajj related to us, from al-Muhāribī, from Abd al-Malik ibn