Thus, the majority—Ahl al-Sunnah—do not establish by means of such a report anything they seek to establish: neither a ruling, nor a virtue, nor anything else. The same applies to the Shia.
Since this alone does not constitute proof, by the agreement of all the [groups] (1), invoking it as proof is invalid. The same applies to everything he transmitted and attributed to Abū Nuaym, al-Tha'labī, al-Naqqāsh, Ibn al-Maghāzilī (2), and others like them.
Second: His statement, “They unanimously agreed that it was revealed concerning Alī,” is one of the gravest false claims. Rather, scholars of transmitted reports unanimously agree that it was not revealed specifically concerning Alī and that Alī did not give his ring in charity while praying. Hadith scholars unanimously agree that the account (3) narrated concerning this is an invented lie. (4)
(1) S and N read: “by the agreement of all of them”; B reads: “by agreement of both of them.”
(2) B reads: “or Ibn al-Maghāzī.”
(3) S reads: “the case.”
(4) In his Tafsīr, al-Ma‘ārif ed., 10:425–426, al-Tabarī cited five reports stating that the person intended by the verse was Alī ibn Abī Tālib, may Allah be pleased with him. These are reports 12210–12214. In the first report, al-Suddī is quoted as saying: “…This applies to all believers. However, a beggar passed by Alī ibn Abī Tālib while he was bowing in the mosque, and Alī gave him his ring.” The following three reports state that the verse was revealed concerning Alī ibn Abī Tālib and that he was among “those who believe.” Mahmūd Shākir commented on report 12213 and established the weakness of two of its transmitters. Regarding the following report, 12214, he likewise stated the following about one of its transmitters, Ghālib ibn Ubayd Allāh al-Uqaylī al-Jazarī: “His hadith are rejected, and he is abandoned as a narrator. Biographical notices on him appear in Lisān al-Mīzān, al-Bukhārī’s al-Kabīr, 4/1:101, and Ibn Abī Hātim, 3/2:48.”
Mahmūd Shākir then said: “I consider it most likely that Abū Ja‘far al-Tabarī omitted the discussion of the words of the Exalted, ‘while they bow,’ and their meaning here, despite the difficulty they raise, because he intended to return to the matter and clarify it further but subsequently overlooked it.” Mahmūd Shākir then quoted Ibn Kathīr’s discussion of this verse: “As for the words ‘while they bow,’ some people mistakenly supposed that this is a circumstantial clause modifying ‘and give zakat,’ meaning that they give it while bowing. Were that so, giving zakat while bowing would be superior to giving it in any other posture, since it would be an act deserving praise. Yet this is not the position of any scholar known to us among the leading authorities who issue fatwas. Some even cited the report concerning Alī ibn Abī Tālib that this verse was revealed about him.” He then cited the preceding reports and others to the same effect, transmitted through various chains.
Mahmūd Shākir then said: “None of these reports constitutes valid proof in matters of religion. The leading scholars have discussed the grammatical function and meaning of this clause. The correct position is that the words ‘while they bow’ mean: ‘while they submit humbly to their Lord and abase themselves before Him through obedience,’” etc. See also Ibn Kathīr’s discussion and criticism of the reports claiming that the verse was revealed concerning Alī, may Allah be pleased with him, and Ibn Taymiyya’s preceding discussion of this verse, 2:30–32.