from people. Do you not see that, because Ibn Abbās possessed abundant knowledge, the Muslim community recognized (1) this in him, benefited from him, and his renown for it spread among the elite and common people alike?
Likewise, because al-Shāfi‘i possessed knowledge and jurisprudence from which benefit could be derived (2), the Muslims recognized this in him, benefited from him in that regard, and he became renowned for his knowledge and jurisprudence.
But when a person does not find what he seeks in a particular place, he does not seek it there. Do you not see that if someone were said to be a physician or a grammarian and were so highly esteemed that physicians or grammarians came to him, but found that he did not possess the medical or grammatical knowledge they sought, they would turn away from him? The mere claims and veneration of the ignorant would be of no benefit to him.
These Imamis adopted from the Mu‘tazilites the doctrine that Allah is obliged to grant capacity, enablement, and providential assistance—whatever brings the morally accountable person (3) closer to righteousness and further from corruption, while he remains capable of either course.
They then said: “The imamate is obligatory; indeed, they regard it as even more obligatory than prophethood because it provides divine assistance in fulfilling religious obligations.”
They said: “We know with certainty, through customary experience (4) and its constancy over time, that whenever a community has an awe-inspiring and obeyed leader who is able to act and possesses unfettered authority, his presence brings them closer to righteousness and further from corruption. But when they have no leader (5), turmoil and disorder break out among them, and they become further from righteousness and closer to corruption.
“This state of affairs, indicative of a rational principle, is well known and is denied only by someone ignorant of