the wording suggests, then this is a claim that could be made only by someone grossly ignorant of the life and conduct of the Messenger of Allah—peace and blessings be upon him. Everyone agrees that, in the year of [the conquest of] Mecca (1), after the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—had declared the lives of a number of people forfeit, including Abd Allah ibn Sa‘d, Uthmān brought him before the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him. Following Uthmān’s appeal to him in the matter, the Prophet accepted his pledge of allegiance and spared his life. He thus became one of the Muslims accorded inviolability, with the same rights and duties as the rest of them. He had been among the [people] most fiercely hostile to the Prophet (2)—peace and blessings be upon him—yet he embraced Islam and became a good Muslim. The Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—had declared his life forfeit, just as he had declared the lives of certain others forfeit, because of the grievousness of their unbelief, such as an aggravated apostasy, as in the case of Miqyās ibn Subābah.
“This Abd Allah had been a scribe of the revelation, but he apostatized and fabricated lies against the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—so the Prophet declared his life forfeit. Then, when Uthmān brought him before the Prophet, he—peace and blessings be upon him—pardoned him.
“Uthmān said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, accept Abd Allah’s pledge of allegiance.’ The Prophet turned away from him two or three times, then accepted his pledge.
“He then said, ‘Was there no right-minded man among you who, seeing that I had turned away from this man, would strike off his head?’
“One of the Ansār said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, why did you not signal to me?’
“He replied, ‘It is not fitting for a prophet to make furtive signals with his eyes.’” (3).