We do not deny that Uthman—may Allah be pleased with him—loved the Umayyads, maintained close ties with them, and gave them large sums of money. What he did was among the matters of independent judgment debated by impartial scholars, just as we (1) do not deny that Ali appointed his relatives to office and fought and killed many (2) Muslims who establish prayer, give zakat, fast, and pray (3). Yet among these were some whom he fought on the basis of scriptural text and consensus, while fighting others was among the matters of independent judgment debated by impartial scholars.
The matter of bloodshed is graver than that of wealth, and the evil caused by bloodshed within the Muslim community was many times greater than the evil caused by giving away wealth.
Thus, if we remain loyal to Ali, love him, and recount the virtues (4) that the Quran and Sunnah attest to, even though what occurred during his caliphate was more open to blame than what occurred during Uthman’s caliphate, and although Uthman’s caliphate witnessed good the like of which did not occur during Ali’s, then we have all the more reason (5) to remain loyal to Uthman, love him, and recount what the Quran and Sunnah attest to (6).
We have already stated that Uthman’s handling of the funds may be understood on three grounds:
The first is that he was the official responsible for administering them, and such an official is entitled to a share even if he is wealthy.