[and he professed Islam] (1), whereupon Umar showed him clemency (2) and manumitted him. If any bond of clientage attached to him, it belonged to the Muslims. If clientage belonged to the person who directly effected the manumission, it belonged to Umar. If no clientage attached to him, however, he was like a captive who, when [released as an act of grace, bears no bond of clientage. For the scholars disagreed concerning a captive who] (3) embraces Islam: Does his embrace of Islam make him a slave, or does he remain free, such that he may be released gratuitously or for ransom, just as before he embraced Islam? They nevertheless agree that his embrace of Islam renders his life inviolable.
There are two well-known views on this issue, both found in the school of Ahmad and in other schools.
Alī played no part [either] (4) in enslaving him or in manumitting him. When Umar [ibn al-Khattāb—may Allah be pleased with him—] was killed, it was (5) Abū Luʾluʾa, the unbelieving Magian and client of al-Mughīra [ibn Shuba] (6), who killed him. He and al-Hurmuzān shared an affinity, and Ubayd Allah ibn Umar was told that Abū Luʾluʾa had been seen with al-Hurmuzān [when Umar was killed] (7). Thus al-Hurmuzān was (8) among those suspected of assisting in Umar’s killing.
When Umar was killed, [Abd Allah] (9) ibn Abbās related that Umar had said to him: “You had (10) been