offered positions of authority, yet he would not accept them, and no one killed him. He was even nominated for the caliphate on the day of the arbitration [but absented himself from it] (1), and no one ever harmed him. Nor has it ever been heard that anyone was killed for refusing to assume authority.
This is therefore the fabrication of a liar who [does not know] what he is writing (2), whether as a matter of Islamic law or ordinary practice.
We then reply by considering both possibilities: either Umar gave this order or he did not. If the former, the objection to it is invalid. If the latter, a man’s being among the people of Paradise or one of Allah’s close servants does not preclude his being killed when Islamic law requires it.
It is established in the authentic collections that the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—had the Ghāmidī woman stoned and said:
“She repented with such repentance that, had one who levies unlawful taxes repented as she did, he would have been forgiven. Can you find anything better than her offering up her very life to Allah?” (3)
The Messenger thus testified to this on her behalf. Yet once the prescribed punishment had been established against her, he ordered that she be stoned.
Likewise, if a man became liable to legal retaliation while being one of Allah’s close servants, and he sincerely repented of deliberate murder, the slain person’s heirs would still have to be given authority over him. If they wished, they could kill him, and his death would be an expiation for him.