al-Sāmit and others like him; among them were men such as Abū Ayyūb al-Ansārī and others like him.
If any one of these men—or anyone else besides them(1)—had a truth to voice, there was no excuse that would have relieved him(2) of the duty to do so. Indeed, some among them spoke during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah—peace and blessings be upon him—about a man who had been appointed(3), even though he deserved the office, and no harm befell them. Talha and others spoke concerning Umar’s appointment when Abū Bakr named him as his successor. Usayd ibn Hudayr also spoke concerning the appointment of Usāma [ibn Zayd](4) during the lifetime of the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him. They would speak to Umar regarding those whom he appointed [and dismissed. After Uthmān assumed office, his power became firmly established, his supporters became numerous, and Banū Umayya rose to prominence; yet they would speak to him regarding those whom he appointed](5), as well as those to whom he made grants, whether from among them or from others.
In the end(6), when they complained about one of them, he dismissed him; and when they complained about someone taking some of the wealth, he prevented him from doing so. Thus, he acceded to their demands for dismissal and the withholding of money. Those petitioning him were leading men among the people, while he(7) was at the height(8) of his authority. How, then, could he have failed to heed the Companions—the foremost and most senior among them—given their prestige and power(9), had they spoken concerning Uthmān’s accession?!
They had spoken to al-Siddīq concerning Umar’s appointment, saying:
“What will you say to your Lord, when you have appointed over us a harsh and stern man?”
He replied:
“Are you trying to frighten me by invoking Allah? I will say: ‘I appointed over them the best of Your servants.’”
Thus, they showed no partiality to al-Siddīq regarding his designation of Umar, despite Umar’s severity.