the Sahih (1)—Sahih Muslim—it is reported that “the Prophet—may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him—gave Salama ibn al-Akwa the shares of both a foot soldier and a horseman during the expedition of al-Ghāba, even though he was on foot, because his feats in killing the enemy, seizing spoils, and striking fear into the enemy were unmatched by anyone else” (2).
The second position is that this is impermissible. This is the position of Mālik and al-Shāfi‘i. Mālik holds that an additional award may be drawn only from the one-fifth share, whereas al-Shāfi‘i holds that it may be drawn only from one-fifth of the one-fifth.
It is authentically established in the Sahih (3) that Ibn Umar said: “We went on a military expedition with the Prophet—may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him—toward Najd. Our shares (4) amounted to twelve camels each, and the Messenger of Allah—may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him—gave each of us one additional camel” (5). One-fifth of the one-fifth would not suffice to cover this additional award.
In sum, this is a matter of independent legal judgment. If Umar deemed preferential distribution permissible when warranted by the public interest, he is the one upon whose tongue and heart Allah placed the truth (6).
As for favoring some over others in the allocation of stipends, there is no doubt that Umar did so and would place