The scholars differed over this, holding three views: Is it abrogated, or does it remain in force? Or does it fall under discretionary punishment, which the ruler may impose when needed but which is not obligatory? Ali—may Allah be pleased with him—would administer more than forty strokes for the prescribed punishment. He said:
“No one upon whom a prescribed punishment is carried out and who then dies would leave me with misgivings, except one punished for drinking wine. If he were to die, I would pay his blood money, for that is something we did on the basis of our own judgment.”
This was narrated by al-Shāfiī and others (1).
Al-Shāfiī cited this as evidence that the additional strokes constitute discretionary punishment imposed through independent judgment. This, in turn, rests upon another issue, namely, whether a person upon whom a prescribed punishment, discretionary punishment, or retaliation is carried out and who consequently dies