Nor have the Rāfidah impugned this. Rather, because of their extremism concerning Alī, they regarded Umar’s assumption of the caliphate as his offense and sought some basis by which his injustice could be demonstrated (1), but they were unable to do so.
As for Alī—may Allah be pleased with him—Ahl al-Sunnah love him and remain loyal to him. They testify that he was one of the Rightly Guided Caliphs and rightly guided imams. Yet half of his subjects impugn his justice: the Khawārij declare him an unbeliever, while others from his household [and outside his household] (2) say that he did not treat them fairly. Uthmān’s supporters say that he was among those who wronged Uthmān. In sum, despite the great number and wide dispersal of his subjects, Alī did not display the same degree of justice as Umar, or anything close to it.
Umar did not appoint any of his relatives to office, whereas Alī appointed his relatives, just as Uthmān appointed his. Despite this, Umar feared that he might have wronged his subjects. He was therefore more just and more fearful of Allah than Alī, and this is among the indications that he was superior to Alī.
Although Umar’s subjects were pleased with him, he feared that he might have wronged them. Alī, however, complained about his subjects and their grievances against him (3), invoked Allah against them, and said:
“I detest them, and they detest me (4). I have grown weary of them, and they have grown weary of me (5). O Allah, replace them for me with people better than they, and replace me for them with someone worse than me.”
“Which of the two parties is more entitled to security, if you know?”