In another transmission (1) of this address (2), it reads:
“To proceed: Allah chose for His Messenger what is with Him over what is with you. This is the Book which (3) Allah used to guide His Messenger (4); so hold fast to it and you will be guided, for Allah (5) guided His Messenger—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—through it (6).”
[The Rāfidī’s remarks concerning Abū Bakr—may Allah be pleased with him—on his deathbed, and the response to them]
(Chapter) (7)
The Rāfidī (8) said:
“Abū Bakr said as death approached: ‘If only I had asked the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—whether the Ansār had any right in this matter.’ This indicates that he doubted the legitimacy of his own caliphate and that it had not been rightfully established.”
The response is that this is a lie (9) against Abū Bakr—may Allah be pleased with him—and he has cited no chain of transmission for it. It is well known that anyone who adduces a transmitted report as evidence in any matter must provide a chain of transmission by which the proof is established. How, then, can anyone impugn the first and foremost believers merely on the basis of a report that has no chain of transmission?
It may further be said: This undermines what you claim (10), namely that ʿAlī was explicitly designated, for if he had