mistook (1) a swollen man for a fat one and blew where there was no fire.
By my life:
I toured (2) every school
and cast my gaze among those landmarks;
yet I saw none but one bewildered, his palm pressed to his chin,
or one remorseful, striking his tooth.”
Thus, he stated that he found only someone bewildered, doubtful, and uncertain, or someone who adopted a belief but then regretted it when its error became clear to him. The former was in simple ignorance:
“Layers of darkness, one above another: when he puts out his hand, he can hardly see it.”
The latter fell into compound ignorance, but then realized that he had been ignorant and regretted it. This is why, when discussing various questions, he cites the positions of the sects and their arguments (3), yet scarcely ever prefers one view because of his bewilderment.
The same applies to al-Āmidī: suspension of judgment and bewilderment predominate in him.
As for al-Rāzī, within a single book—indeed, within a single passage—he supports one position, while elsewhere in that same book or in another book he supports its opposite. Thus, he ultimately settled into bewilderment and doubt. Accordingly, when it was stated that the most perfect knowledge is knowledge of Allah (4), His attributes, and His acts, it was also stated that each of these presents a difficulty (5). I have cited