It has also been said:
Rather, this refers to someone who embraced Islam but did not emigrate, as Abū Hanīfa holds. Yet this does require expiation in his case.
It has also been said:
If he belonged to an enemy people, he had no heir, and so his blood money was not to be paid to the enemy people (1); rather, expiation alone was required. This applies whether he was known to be a believer and was killed accidentally, or was presumed to be an unbeliever. This is the apparent meaning of the verse.
Some exegetes have said that this verse was revealed concerning Abdullah ibn Salām and his companions, as has been related from Ibn Jurayj, Muqātil, and Ibn Zayd—meaning His words, “Indeed, among the People of the Book…” Others said that it concerns the believers among the People of the Book, both Jews and Christians (2).
If what is meant by this is someone who was outwardly counted among the People of the Book, it is equivalent to the first view; but if it is intended generally, it is equivalent to the second. This is the view of Mujāhid, and Abū Sālih related it from Ibn Abbās. The view of those who included Ibn Salām and others like him within the scope of the verse is weak, for these men were believers outwardly and inwardly, in every respect. It cannot properly be said of them:
“Indeed, among the People of the Book are those who believe in Allah and what has been revealed to you and what was revealed to them, humbling themselves before Allah. They do not sell Allah’s revelations for a paltry price. They will have their reward with their Lord. Indeed, Allah is swift in reckoning.”
[Surah Āl Imrān: 199]
The first reason is that Ibn Salām embraced Islam when the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—first arrived in Medina. He said:
“When I saw his face, I knew (3) that it was not the face of a liar.” (4)