The supplication made for them and mutual imprecation are both founded on justice (1). The other party, too, must therefore summon those most closely related to them by lineage, for they fear for them what they do not fear for outsiders. Hence they refrained from (2) mutual imprecation, knowing that he (3) was upon the truth and that, if they entered into mutual imprecation with him, Allah’s curse (4) would inevitably befall them and their closest relatives. Indeed, a person may fear for his child what he does not fear (5) for himself.
If (6) the authentically established merits of Alī—may Allah be pleased with him—such as the Prophet’s words—may Allah bless him and grant him peace:
“I shall certainly give the banner to a man who loves Allah and His Messenger, and whom Allah and His Messenger love”;
his words:
“Are you not pleased to be to me as Aaron was to Moses?”;
and his words:
“O Allah, these (7) are the members of my household, so remove all impurity from them and purify them completely”
—were not unique to him but were shared by others, why did some of the Companions wish to have the same distinction, as reported of Sa‘d (8) and Umar?
The answer is that this contains the Prophet’s testimony—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—that Alī possessed faith both inwardly and outwardly. It also affirms his loyalty to Allah and His Messenger and the obligation of the believers to be loyal to him. It therefore refutes the Nawāsib, who believe him to have been an unbeliever or a sinner, such as the renegade Kharijites, who were among the most devoted of people in worship, as was said by the Prophet (9)—may Allah bless him