fabricated hadiths whose falsity would be obvious to anyone with even the slightest knowledge of hadith, let alone to the hadith scholars. He is neither a hadith scholar nor anyone to whom recourse should ever be had in this discipline (1). Hadith experts know that these hadiths are fabrications. This man had stated that he would cite what they regard as authentic and have transmitted in their authoritative statements and books. How, then, can he cite something they unanimously agree is a fabricated lie, which has not been narrated (2) in any authoritative hadith collection and which no hadith imam has authenticated?
The first ten (3) are all fabrications, through the end of the hadith about his killing (4) Amr ibn Abd Wudd. As for the hadith of Sa'd: when Mu'āwiya ordered him to revile Alī, he refused. Mu'āwiya asked:
“What prevented you from reviling Alī ibn Abī Tālib?”
He replied:
“There are three things the Messenger of Allah—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—said about him, and I shall never revile him; possessing just one of them would be dearer to me than red camels...”
Thus the hadith continues. This is an authentic hadith narrated by Muslim in his Sahīh (5). It contains three virtues of Alī, but they are neither unique distinctions of the imams nor unique distinctions of