was wrongfully killed as a martyr, and that those who killed him were unjust aggressors. The hadiths of the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—in which he commands fighting (1) anyone who breaks away from the community did not apply to him. He—may Allah be pleased with him—did not divide (2) the community. He was killed only while seeking to return (3) to his homeland, to go [to] the frontier (4), or to go to Yazīd—remaining within the community and renouncing any division of the Ummah (5). Even if the person requesting this had been the least of men, his request would have had to be granted. How, then, could al-Husayn’s request not have been granted?! Even if the person seeking these options had been of a lesser standing than al-Husayn, it would not have been permissible to detain or restrain him, let alone take him captive and kill him.
Likewise, the statement:
“The wrath of Allah and my wrath are severe against whoever sheds the blood of my family and harms me through my kindred.”
These are words that none but an ignorant person (6) would transmit from the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—or attribute to him. The protection afforded to the blood of al-Hasan, al-Husayn, and others by faith and piety is weightier than mere kinship. If a man belonged to the household of the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—but committed an act warranting his execution or the amputation of a limb, that would be permissible by the consensus of the Muslims,