tribe of Quraysh (1) that did not share a bond of kinship with the Messenger of Allah—peace and blessings be upon him. He therefore said:
“‘I ask no reward of you for it except affection for near kin’: that is, only that you show affection toward me (2) on account of the kinship between me and you.”
This was narrated by al-Bukhārī and others (3).
A number of Sunni and Shia authors, including some of Ahmad’s followers and others, have cited a hadith from the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—stating: “When this verse was revealed, they asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, who are these people?’ He replied, ‘Alī, Fātima, and their two sons.’” This is a lie by consensus of those knowledgeable [in hadith] (4).
[Further evidence of this is that this verse was revealed in Mecca, by scholarly consensus] (5), for the whole of Surah al-Shūrā is Meccan. Indeed, the entire Hā Mīm group consists of Meccan surahs. Moreover, Alī did not marry Fātima until he was in Medina, as previously mentioned, and al-Hasan and al-Husayn were not born to him until the third and fourth years after the Hijra, respectively. How, then, could it be that “when the verse was revealed in Mecca, they asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, who are these people?’ He replied, ‘Alī, Fātima, and their two sons’”?
The hadith master Abd al-Ghanī al-Maqdisī said:
“Al-Hasan was born in the third year after the Hijra, halfway through Ramadan. This is the soundest view on the matter. Al-Husayn was born when five days of Shabān had passed, in the fourth year after the Hijra.”
He said:
“It is also said that he was born in the third year.”
I say: Whoever holds this view maintains that al-Hasan was born in the second year (6), and this view