his army until they stood their ground against them and defeated them (1).
Ali was superior to Muāwiya and higher in rank, and the truth was more on his side, as everyone agreed. Muāwiya’s army knew that Ali was superior to him and had a greater right to rule (2). The only one [among them] (3) who denied this was an obstinate man or one whose heart had been blinded by desire.
Before the arbitration of the two arbiters, Muāwiya had not claimed the caliphate for himself or assumed the title Commander of the Faithful. Rather, he only (4) claimed [it] (5) after the two arbiters had rendered their decision. More than one man in Muāwiya’s army would say to him, “Why do you fight Ali when you possess neither his precedence nor his merit (6), nor his status as the Prophet’s son-in-law, and he has a greater right to rule than you?” Muāwiya would acknowledge this to them.
They nevertheless fought alongside Muāwiya because they believed that Ali’s army had within it (7) wrongdoers who would attack them just as they had attacked Uthmān, and that they were fighting those men to repel their aggression against them (8). It is permissible to fight an aggressor. For this reason, they did not initiate the fighting against them; rather, it was the other side that began it.
Hence al-Ashtar al-Nakhaī said, “They are prevailing over us because we were the ones who initiated hostilities against them—initiated hostilities against them” (9).
Ali—may Allah be pleased with him—was unable to subdue the wrongdoers in the two armies, and did not