It is said that he committed an offense carrying a prescribed punishment, for which Uthmān had him flogged. He consequently harbored resentment against Uthmān [because of the pride (1) he took in his father, Abū Bakr; and when the fomenters of sedition rose up against Uthmān] (2), they say that he was among them, entered Uthmān’s presence, and seized him by the beard. Uthmān said to him, “You have taken a grave liberty (3)—one your father would never have taken.”
It is also said that he withdrew when Uthmān said [to him] (4) those words, and that someone else killed Uthmān.
He subsequently fought alongside Alī in his wars, and Alī appointed him governor of Egypt. He was killed there: Uthmān’s supporters killed him because they knew that he had been among those who rebelled against him. His body was placed inside a donkey’s carcass and burned. He was killed by Muāwiya ibn Hudayj (5).
The Rāfidis go to excess in venerating him, in keeping with their corrupt habit of praising the fomenters of sedition who rose against Uthmān and lavishing praise upon those who fought alongside Alī. They even prefer Muhammad ibn Abū Bakr to his father, Abū Bakr: they curse the best member of the Ummah after its Prophet, yet praise his son, who had neither Companionship, precedence in the faith, nor any particular virtue. In this regard, they also contradict themselves in their veneration of