the designated Hāshimite successor lest he compel them to accept the truth they disliked, then putting forward (1) someone who would secure their demands while retaining Hāshimite leadership—namely, al-Abbās—would have been more appropriate and more advantageous to them than Abū Bakr, who would not assist them in obtaining their demands as al-Abbās would and would compel them to accept the bitter truth even more than Alī would. If they disliked some bitter truth from Alī, they would have disliked it even more from (2) Abū Bakr; and if they sought sweet worldly gains from Abū Bakr, they could more readily have obtained them from al-Abbās and Alī. Their turning away from Alī, al-Abbās, and others in favor of Abū Bakr therefore proves that they placed the truth where it belonged [and settled it in its proper form] (3), pursued the soundest course by its proper means (4), and knew that Allah and His Messenger were pleased that Abū Bakr—may Allah be pleased with him—should be given precedence.
This was something they knew clearly and unmistakably from what they had seen and heard from the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—throughout their companionship with him. Through prolonged observation, experience (5), and hearing, they knew enough of the Prophet’s preference for Abū Bakr to require them to give him precedence and obey him. Hence Umar—may Allah be pleased with him—said:
“There is no one among you (6) to whom (7) people journey from afar as they do to Abū Bakr.” (8)
He meant that Abū Bakr’s superiority over everyone else was manifest and evident, requiring no investigation or deliberation.