through legal stratagems; they do not take intentions (1) into account in a contract, and they render the prescribed punishments inoperative (2) to such an extent that no country could be governed according to their doctrine. Thus, they do not amputate the hand of anyone who steals food, fruit, or items originally open to common use. Nor do they administer the prescribed punishment to anyone who drinks (3) wine unless he confesses or evidence (4) is established against him. They do not punish him if he is seen vomiting it up or if (5) its odor is detected on him, although the practice of Allah’s Messenger—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and his caliphs was contrary to this. They do not require retaliatory execution for a killing committed with a heavy object (6), nor do they treat the killer as he treated the victim. The offender may have (7) severed both of the victim’s hands (8) and feet and slit open his belly, yet they content themselves with striking off (9) his head. They execute one of the most virtuous Muslims for killing a single protected unbeliever, and equate the blood money of the Emigrants and the Helpers with that of the unbelievers (10) belonging to the protected communities. They waive the prescribed punishment for someone who has intercourse with a woman permanently forbidden to him in marriage—such as his mother or daughter—despite knowing that it is prohibited, merely (11) because of the formal semblance of a contract, just as they waive it when a contract of hire (12) has been made for sexual access; and they do not combine