[The Rāfidi’s claim that the Messenger of Allah named Ali the Fārūq of his nation, and the response to it]
Section [R, H]; S: Chapter Twenty-Four.
The Rāfidi said in (1):
“They called Umar ‘al-Fārūq’ (2), yet they did not call Ali [peace be upon him]—peace be upon him—(3) by that name, even though the Messenger of Allah—peace and blessings be upon him—said [of him] (4): ‘This is the Fārūq of my nation, who distinguishes the people of truth from the people of falsehood.’ [Ibn] Umar (5) also said: ‘During the Prophet’s lifetime—peace and blessings be upon him—we recognized the hypocrites only by their hatred of Ali—peace be upon him.’ (6)”
The response is as follows:
First: As for these two hadiths, those knowledgeable in hadith have no doubt that they (7) are fabricated reports falsely attributed to the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him. Neither of them is reported in [any of] (8) the authoritative books of Islamic scholarship, nor does either have a known chain of transmission. I have found neither report in the collections of authentic hadith nor in the collections of fabricated hadith.
Second: Anyone who adduces a hadith as evidence regarding a subsidiary issue must provide its chain of transmission; how much more necessary is this in matters concerning the foundations of religion? Otherwise, the mere statement, “The Messenger of Allah said