: “Obedience is only in what is right.” (1)
Thus, when he stated obedience to his appointed commanders without qualification, while intending obedience only in what is right, his statement, “Whoever causes her distress has caused me distress,” must, all the more so, be understood as referring to distress caused in connection with what is right. This is because obedience to his appointed commanders is obligatory, and acting contrary to it is a grave act of disobedience. Doing something that distresses Fātima, however, is not equivalent to disobeying a command of the Prophet (2)—peace and blessings be upon him. Otherwise, it would follow that Alī had (3) done something graver (4) than disobeying Allah and His Messenger; for disobeying his appointed commanders is to disobey him, and disobeying him is to disobey Allah (5).
(* Then, if an objector were to object and say: Abū Bakr and Umar both held authority; Allah commanded obedience to those vested (6) with authority; and obedience to the ruler is obedience to Allah, while disobedience to him is disobedience to Allah (7), *) (8), then whoever resents his command and judgment has resented Allah’s command and judgment.
He could then go on to denounce Alī and Fātima—may Allah be pleased with them both—charging that they had rejected Allah’s command, resented His judgment, and disliked what pleases Allah. For Allah is pleased by obedience to Him and by obedience to the ruler. Whoever dislikes obedience to the ruler has shown aversion to Allah’s good pleasure, and Allah is displeased