“Among them are those who criticize you over the distribution of alms. If they are given some of it, they are pleased; but if they are not given any, they immediately become angry. If only they had been content with what Allah and His Messenger gave them and had said, ‘Allah is sufficient for us. Allah will give us from His bounty, as will His Messenger. Indeed, it is Allah whom we desire.’”
[Surat al-Tawbah: 58, 59]
Thus, Allah (1) mentioned people who were pleased when they were given something and became angry when they were not, and He censured them for it. Therefore, is one who praises Fātimah for conduct resembling theirs not (2) disparaging her? May Allah destroy the Rāfidah and vindicate the Prophet’s household against them, for they have attributed to them defects (3) and disgrace that are obvious to anyone with eyes to see.
If someone were to say, “Fātimah sought only what was rightfully hers,” this would be no more justified than saying, “Abū Bakr would not deny a Jew or a Christian his due, so how could he deny the foremost lady of all women what was rightfully hers?” Allah Most High and His Messenger—peace and blessings be upon him—testified that Abū Bakr spent his wealth for Allah’s sake, so how could he deny people their own wealth?
Fātimah—may Allah be pleased with her—had asked the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—for some wealth, but he did not give it to her. This is established in the two Sahīh collections from Alī—may Allah be pleased with him—in the hadith concerning the servant: when Fātimah went to the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—to ask him for a servant, he did not give her one but instead taught her the words of glorification (4). And if she was permitted to ask the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—for something