but rather say that they were powerless, prevented, and overcome by wrongdoers. None of them was ever able to exercise the imamate except Ali ibn Abī Tālib, although affairs proved intractable for him, and half the Muslim community—or somewhat less or more—did not pledge allegiance to him. Indeed, many of them fought against him, and he fought against them; while many neither fought against him (1) nor fought alongside him. Among the latter were some who were better than those who fought against him and those who fought alongside him (2). They included eminent Muslims whose equals were not found among those with Ali (3). Indeed, those who refrained from fighting with him and for him were better than those who fought against him and those who fought alongside him.
If, however, by this (4) he means that they possessed knowledge and religious devotion by virtue of which they deserved to be imams, then—even if this claim were valid—it would not entail that they were imams whom people were obliged to obey. A man’s deserving to be the prayer leader of a mosque does not make him its prayer leader; his deserving to be a judge [does not make him a judge] (5); and his deserving to be a military commander does not make him one. Prayer is valid only behind someone who is actually serving as the prayer leader, not behind someone who merely ought to be the prayer leader. Likewise, judgment between people can be rendered (6) only by someone who possesses authority and power, not by someone who merely deserves appointment to the judiciary. Similarly, soldiers fight only under a commander appointed over them, not under someone who has not been appointed, even if he deserves (7) to be appointed.