This indicates that what al-Hasan did by refraining from fighting [for the imamate and seeking reconciliation among the Muslims (1) was beloved—Allah and His Messenger loved it. It was not a calamity; rather,] (2) it was dearer to Allah and His Messenger than Muslims fighting one another. For this reason, he loved him and loved Usāmah [ibn Zayd] (3), and prayed for them both, for both of them (4) disliked fighting amid civil strife (5). As for Usāmah, he did not (6) fight alongside either Alī or Muāwiyah, while al-Hasan continually advised Alī to refrain from fighting.] (7)
This is the very opposite of the Rāfidah’s position that this reconciliation was a calamity and a humiliation. Had there been an infallible imam whom everyone was obliged to obey, such that anyone else who assumed authority held invalid authority and it was impermissible to fight alongside him or pray behind him, then this reconciliation would have been one of the greatest calamities to befall the nation of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and would have corrupted its religion. [What virtue, then, would al-Hasan have possessed because of it (8), such that he should be praised for it? His utmost claim (9) would merely be that he was excused because his weakness prevented him from engaging in the obligatory fighting (10).] (11) Yet the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—made al-Hasan, through the reconciliation, a leader