Allah bless him and grant him peace] (1), and they hold two views concerning a person who is widely praised among the people.
It is thus clear that the Imāmiyya possess no praiseworthy certainty by which they are distinguished from Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā‘a.
If they say:
“We (2) categorically affirm that every person whom we judge to be observing the religious obligations and refraining from forbidden acts is among the people of Paradise, without any infallible authority informing us of his inward state,”
it is said in reply:
This issue is not peculiar to the Imāmiyya. If there is a sound means of establishing this, it is equally available to Ahl (3) al-Sunnah, who are more adept at pursuing it. If there is no (4) sound means of establishing it, then such an assertion is made without knowledge, and there is no (5) virtue in it; rather, virtue lies in refraining from it.
In short, they claim no sound knowledge to which Ahl al-Sunnah do not have a stronger claim. Any claim of theirs that proceeds from ignorance is a deficiency, and Ahl al-Sunnah are further removed from it.
Affirming that a particular man is among the people of Paradise may be based on information conveyed by an infallible authority, or it may be based on the concurrence of the testimonies (6) of the believers, who are Allah’s witnesses on earth.